How Courts Are Recognizing Fibromyalgia as Grounds for Permanent Disability

Legal Recognition Across Different Jurisdictions

Social Security Administration (SSA) — SSR 12‑2p

In 2012, the SSA issued Social Security Ruling 12‑2p, formally confirming that fibromyalgia can qualify as a medically determinable impairment when properly documented by physicians using criteria like the 1990 or 2010 ACR guidelines. Courts now mandate that adjudicators evaluate fibromyalgia holistically—considering tender point exams, symptom patterns, and longitudinal evidence, rather than dismissing it due to lack of lab findings.

In Revels v. Berryhill (9th Cir., 2017), the court reversed a denial of benefits after finding the ALJ ignored SSR 12‑2p and mishandled medical opinions regarding fibromyalgia. The ruling underscored the importance of recognizing fibromyalgia’s disabling potential when symptom testimony and expert opinions are credible.

Federal Circuit Decisions Involving ERISA Plans

• Kennedy v. Lilly (7th Cir., 2017): The Seventh Circuit upheld permanent disability benefits for an executive whose fibromyalgia (among other conditions) rendered her unable to work. It criticized the insurer’s role as both claims adjudicator and payor, noting the plaintiff’s long-term physician support of permanent disability.
• In other ERISA cases—particularly under Epic Life’s policies (e.g. Niemuth v. Epic Life, 2024)—courts have denied claims where medical documentation was weak or overly reliant on subjective reports rather than objective testing. This highlights the ongoing need for thorough medical records and strong physician support.

State-Level and Administrative Decisions

Workers’ compensation panels have also ruled in favor of fibromyalgia as a compensable, permanent condition. For instance, a California worker was awarded a 65% permanent partial disability rating after fibromyalgia was recognized as an industrial injury.

---

Key Legal Principles Emerging From These Cases

1. Allow fibromyalgia as a real medical impairment
   SSA’s SSR 12‑2p codified the condition as disabling when supported by physician evidence and symptom documentation.
2. Treat fibromyalgia differently from conditions needing lab tests
   Courts repeatedly stress that demanding objective proof is inappropriate given fibromyalgia’s subjective pain profile.
3. Prioritize treating physicians’ assessments
   Judges have overturned denials when ALJs undervalued ongoing doctor opinions—for example, in Gister v. Massanari, Wates v. Barnhart, and Gavigan—especially when medical evidence shows trigger points and treatment consistency.
4. Require fuller development of the record
   Courts insist adjudicators must obtain all relevant medical evidence and engage treating physicians as needed to fill gaps.
5. Use SSA’s multi-step test
   Evaluations must follow SSR 12‑2p’s two-part process: confirming diagnosis and then assessing symptom severity based on all evidence.

---

Impact on Claimants

• Enhanced legitimacy: Recognition through SSR 12‑2p and court rulings means fibromyalgia claims are taken more seriously—especially when well-supported by documentation.
• Coverage varies: ERISA plans still sometimes deny claims, especially where documentation is weak. These cases emphasize the importance of robust evidence.
• Multi-jurisdictional wins: Federal and state decisions—including workers’ comp and SSD claims—show fibromyalgia can be recognized across different venues.

---

Practical Takeaways for Claimants

If you’re pursuing a permanent disability claim based on fibromyalgia:

• Document thoroughly: Include physician notes on tender points, symptom patterns, fatigue, and functionality.
• Follow SSR 12‑2p guidance: Ensure evaluation meets SSA standards—document diagnosis using ACR criteria and track symptoms over time.
• Obtain multiple medical opinions: Having consistent support from primary care doctors, rheumatologists, and even psychiatrists strengthens your case.
• Stand your ground: Courts increasingly reject denials based solely on lack of objective evidence or ALJ dismissal of symptom testimony.

---

Conclusion

Landmark judicial developments—from the SSA, federal circuit courts, and administrative bodies—have firmly established fibromyalgia as a condition that can warrant permanent disability status. Critical to success are strong medical documentation, reliance on established diagnostic criteria, and judicial understanding of the condition’s subjective nature. While insurer resistance remains in some ERISA scenarios, recent favorable rulings reflect a meaningful shift in how courts view fibromyalgia: as a legitimate, chronic, and often disabling condition deserving of recognition and compensation.